<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No Apologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noapologies.ca/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noapologies.ca</link>
	<description>Punching a Hole in Political Correctness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facts are Still Forbidden Terri-Tory: Tom Bartlett by Rob Cheshire</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/facts-are-still-forbidden-terri-tory-tom-bartlett/comment-page-1#comment-56697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Cheshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=18036#comment-56697</guid>
		<description>The reason individuals do not want the debate opened, is because most people don&#039;t care.   Most Canadians are about as deep as the coffee they spilled at Tim Horton&#039;s. 
They are selfish, self centred and haven&#039;t gotten around to truly thinking about where they would be if their own mother and father were pro-abortion.  I wonder sometimes, if the brutally, mindless people who support such genocide, upon the most defenseless, voiceless and innocent - Well, maybe their parents would reconsider
and make their errant offspring a choice, rather than an obligation.  It&#039;s a humourous idea to suggest to some, that their own lives could have been snuffed out, even more humourous suggesting that one&#039;s parents viewing their son or daughters illogical and brutal ideas, to make that choice a retroactive one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason individuals do not want the debate opened, is because most people don&#8217;t care.   Most Canadians are about as deep as the coffee they spilled at Tim Horton&#8217;s.<br />
They are selfish, self centred and haven&#8217;t gotten around to truly thinking about where they would be if their own mother and father were pro-abortion.  I wonder sometimes, if the brutally, mindless people who support such genocide, upon the most defenseless, voiceless and innocent &#8211; Well, maybe their parents would reconsider<br />
and make their errant offspring a choice, rather than an obligation.  It&#8217;s a humourous idea to suggest to some, that their own lives could have been snuffed out, even more humourous suggesting that one&#8217;s parents viewing their son or daughters illogical and brutal ideas, to make that choice a retroactive one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facts are Still Forbidden Terri-Tory: Tom Bartlett by Ian Tuck</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/facts-are-still-forbidden-terri-tory-tom-bartlett/comment-page-1#comment-56695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=18036#comment-56695</guid>
		<description>The reason the pro abortionists don&#039;t want the issue reopened is because they don&#039;t have any good arguments to counter points like Tom and other knowledgeable pro baby and pro moms bring forward.  When the pro aborts argue they start name calling instead of arguing any valid points.  Their actions are misogynistic in the extreme, because what they do is to control these women to do what the abortionist wish for them to do, using misinformation and ignorance.  
As for violence, it is already happening to persons who oppose the killing of babies in the womb.  What the state is doing to Linda Gibbons is violent.  Violent means were used to arrest and incarcerate and keep a harmless grandmother in jail, who wants to help other girls to not make the same mistake she did.
John Tory obviously will not respond, because how could he without actually agreeing with Tom&#039;s points of argument?  He obviously doesn&#039;t have the backbone for doing the right thing, so he doesn&#039;t respond and he gives no opportunity for debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the pro abortionists don&#8217;t want the issue reopened is because they don&#8217;t have any good arguments to counter points like Tom and other knowledgeable pro baby and pro moms bring forward.  When the pro aborts argue they start name calling instead of arguing any valid points.  Their actions are misogynistic in the extreme, because what they do is to control these women to do what the abortionist wish for them to do, using misinformation and ignorance.<br />
As for violence, it is already happening to persons who oppose the killing of babies in the womb.  What the state is doing to Linda Gibbons is violent.  Violent means were used to arrest and incarcerate and keep a harmless grandmother in jail, who wants to help other girls to not make the same mistake she did.<br />
John Tory obviously will not respond, because how could he without actually agreeing with Tom&#8217;s points of argument?  He obviously doesn&#8217;t have the backbone for doing the right thing, so he doesn&#8217;t respond and he gives no opportunity for debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dwarf-Tossing: A Canadian Dilemma: Rod Taylor by Tom Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/dwarf-tossing-a-canadian-dilemma-rod-taylor/comment-page-1#comment-56670</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=18009#comment-56670</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no longer convinced that &quot;the opposite of love isn&#039;t hate, but indifference,&quot; since I&#039;ve seen too much hatred being spewed out from leaders of groups that are intent on vilifying and destroying their opponents. Indifference, however, is an effective tool of Satan and these groups because it numbs the conscience. I find that both hate and indifference often are rooted in the same thing - namely guilt. Hatred takes an offensive approach to deal with their guilt while indifference internalizes the guilt and numbs the person from standing against the pressure to do wrong. I despair for those who promote or go along with abortion whatever the reason. Denigrating or being willing to oppress others in any way reflects a deeply disturbed mental state that needs Christ to find freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no longer convinced that &#8220;the opposite of love isn&#8217;t hate, but indifference,&#8221; since I&#8217;ve seen too much hatred being spewed out from leaders of groups that are intent on vilifying and destroying their opponents. Indifference, however, is an effective tool of Satan and these groups because it numbs the conscience. I find that both hate and indifference often are rooted in the same thing &#8211; namely guilt. Hatred takes an offensive approach to deal with their guilt while indifference internalizes the guilt and numbs the person from standing against the pressure to do wrong. I despair for those who promote or go along with abortion whatever the reason. Denigrating or being willing to oppress others in any way reflects a deeply disturbed mental state that needs Christ to find freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dwarf-Tossing: A Canadian Dilemma: Rod Taylor by Ian Tuck</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/dwarf-tossing-a-canadian-dilemma-rod-taylor/comment-page-1#comment-56668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=18009#comment-56668</guid>
		<description>Talk about &quot;a hate crime.&quot;  Killing babies before they have taken their first breath is more of a &quot;hate crime,&quot; than vandalizing someones property or even punching them in the nose because they are different.  The descriptions of how those little ones are &quot;tossed&quot; from this socialist society sounds about as hateful as one could get.  Socialism is cruel and hateful, Christianity is loving and kind.
My heart goes out to the potential moms who get duped into killing their unborn child through abortion, but the purveyors of the killing industry, who kill for money are nothing but hateful.  A person has to be filled with hate in order to go into an industry were the killing of others is done for money, and this isn&#039;t just a killing of others, it is the killing of defenseless babies.  The most adorable and precious ones in our society.
God help us, the Christians sleep as the slaughter rages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about &#8220;a hate crime.&#8221;  Killing babies before they have taken their first breath is more of a &#8220;hate crime,&#8221; than vandalizing someones property or even punching them in the nose because they are different.  The descriptions of how those little ones are &#8220;tossed&#8221; from this socialist society sounds about as hateful as one could get.  Socialism is cruel and hateful, Christianity is loving and kind.<br />
My heart goes out to the potential moms who get duped into killing their unborn child through abortion, but the purveyors of the killing industry, who kill for money are nothing but hateful.  A person has to be filled with hate in order to go into an industry were the killing of others is done for money, and this isn&#8217;t just a killing of others, it is the killing of defenseless babies.  The most adorable and precious ones in our society.<br />
God help us, the Christians sleep as the slaughter rages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vellacott’s exposé of CTV’s so-called “investigation” of crisis pregnancy centres by R. Guzak</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/analysis/vellacotts-expose-of-ctvs-so-called-investigation-of-crisis-pregnancy-centres/comment-page-1#comment-56554</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Guzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17970#comment-56554</guid>
		<description>I agree whole heartedly with this review of the CTV documentary. When I saw the interviews and reports it was so obvious how one sided this was that I was wondering how I could respond. I appreciate the opportunity and information. I had NO IDEA that the pro-choice groups get government funding while groups like PCC must rely on the generosity of people who truly want to help and KNOW what there money is used for. I certainly don&#039;t want MY tax dillars to go towards abortions. I prefer to let women have an &quot;actual&quot; choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole heartedly with this review of the CTV documentary. When I saw the interviews and reports it was so obvious how one sided this was that I was wondering how I could respond. I appreciate the opportunity and information. I had NO IDEA that the pro-choice groups get government funding while groups like PCC must rely on the generosity of people who truly want to help and KNOW what there money is used for. I certainly don&#8217;t want MY tax dillars to go towards abortions. I prefer to let women have an &#8220;actual&#8221; choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The God bone&#8217;s connected to the Tebow: Tom Bartlett by Tom Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/the-god-bones-connected-to-the-tebow-tom-bartlett/comment-page-1#comment-56540</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17943#comment-56540</guid>
		<description>Devin,

I appreciated your respectful answer and kudos for the site. I certainly believe that discussion would be much more respectful, civil and productive if you were representative of more who participate in &quot;debates&quot; which almost always mischaracterize the argument or denigrate the perceived &quot;intent&quot; of the writer rather than responding to the content.

As to the substance of your points, in a country that is roughly deemed to be 85% Christian, why would this be controversial in the first place? It sounds to me like a circular argument - Christians are in the majority so they can&#039;t be discriminated against, but public displays of his faith (one shared by the vast majority of the population) should be kept off the field and out of the public eye.

The fact is that, if the U.S. is made up so predominantly of Christians, why are Christian values so misunderstood and deemed politically to be extreme and outside the pale. Here in Canada under soft socialism, we are in the same boat - only worse. There is almost no one championing Christian values and liberal/secular/socialist concepts are considered &quot;mainstream&quot; and that is across all our major political parties. 

The reaction to Tim Tebow shows exactly what is wrong culturally. Elitists in government, academia, the media, and in the courts are undermining the very values that the majority of the country would appear to hold. My view is that &quot;Christianity&quot; has become a largely elastic and meaningless term due to infiltration of liberal ideology across the culture. To be a Christian is to be a devout follower of Christ (his teachings, his example) and embracing his sacrifice under recognition we are all sinners. Far too many self-identifying &quot;Christian&#039;s&quot; reject almost all that Christ and the bible proclaim. They also don&#039;t have a &quot;love&quot; for sinners - most of whom are bible-believing evangelicals and their is no examination into their own dark hearts. That is exactly why sites like noapologies and christiangovernment exist and why Tim Tebow&#039;s bold example is so needed. 

Most who reject Christian/conservative values reject a mythology of what the public is told they are. Tebow is deemed a showboat rather than devout because that is the liberal narrative. When you have embraced the life changing reality of accepting Christ as your personal saviour, you should want to let everyone know about it and be a powerful witness. The only other options are to make your faith irrelevant by denouncing it&#039;s very value; or forcing it on others. These aren&#039;t options, but a betrayal of all that Christianity stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devin,</p>
<p>I appreciated your respectful answer and kudos for the site. I certainly believe that discussion would be much more respectful, civil and productive if you were representative of more who participate in &#8220;debates&#8221; which almost always mischaracterize the argument or denigrate the perceived &#8220;intent&#8221; of the writer rather than responding to the content.</p>
<p>As to the substance of your points, in a country that is roughly deemed to be 85% Christian, why would this be controversial in the first place? It sounds to me like a circular argument &#8211; Christians are in the majority so they can&#8217;t be discriminated against, but public displays of his faith (one shared by the vast majority of the population) should be kept off the field and out of the public eye.</p>
<p>The fact is that, if the U.S. is made up so predominantly of Christians, why are Christian values so misunderstood and deemed politically to be extreme and outside the pale. Here in Canada under soft socialism, we are in the same boat &#8211; only worse. There is almost no one championing Christian values and liberal/secular/socialist concepts are considered &#8220;mainstream&#8221; and that is across all our major political parties. </p>
<p>The reaction to Tim Tebow shows exactly what is wrong culturally. Elitists in government, academia, the media, and in the courts are undermining the very values that the majority of the country would appear to hold. My view is that &#8220;Christianity&#8221; has become a largely elastic and meaningless term due to infiltration of liberal ideology across the culture. To be a Christian is to be a devout follower of Christ (his teachings, his example) and embracing his sacrifice under recognition we are all sinners. Far too many self-identifying &#8220;Christian&#8217;s&#8221; reject almost all that Christ and the bible proclaim. They also don&#8217;t have a &#8220;love&#8221; for sinners &#8211; most of whom are bible-believing evangelicals and their is no examination into their own dark hearts. That is exactly why sites like noapologies and christiangovernment exist and why Tim Tebow&#8217;s bold example is so needed. </p>
<p>Most who reject Christian/conservative values reject a mythology of what the public is told they are. Tebow is deemed a showboat rather than devout because that is the liberal narrative. When you have embraced the life changing reality of accepting Christ as your personal saviour, you should want to let everyone know about it and be a powerful witness. The only other options are to make your faith irrelevant by denouncing it&#8217;s very value; or forcing it on others. These aren&#8217;t options, but a betrayal of all that Christianity stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The God bone&#8217;s connected to the Tebow: Tom Bartlett by Devin William DeFrancesco</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/the-god-bones-connected-to-the-tebow-tom-bartlett/comment-page-1#comment-56537</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin William DeFrancesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17943#comment-56537</guid>
		<description>Hi,

While I personally harbor no ill will towards individual Christians, I am an Atheist, and I would like to attempt to explain why I personally find the Tebow thing strange.
America is a country where something like 85% of people are Christian. It&#039;s not like Christianity is some persecuted religion here (regardless of what the conservatives here are insisting is what goes on). It&#039;s just a little strange when almost every football player is probably playing, and Tebow insists on making sure that everyone knows that he&#039;s praying. Despite that, I would like to stress that I think Tebow is a wonderful person. There are few people in the world that blow their money on helping others... I just wish he would let others talk about his strong faith like everyone else does, rather than making sure that everyone and their mother knows he has a strong faith. To me, it just smacks of worrying about what men think of you rather than doing it for the cause...

P.S. By US standards, I&#039;m a disgusting liberal (that leans Socialist even!). Your blog is far better than any conservative blog I have ever seen based in the US. While I definitely don&#039;t agree with all of your conclusions, I really wish that conservatives in our country were asking the kind of tough questions that you demanded of liberal society. I personally believe that everyone would come out better off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>While I personally harbor no ill will towards individual Christians, I am an Atheist, and I would like to attempt to explain why I personally find the Tebow thing strange.<br />
America is a country where something like 85% of people are Christian. It&#8217;s not like Christianity is some persecuted religion here (regardless of what the conservatives here are insisting is what goes on). It&#8217;s just a little strange when almost every football player is probably playing, and Tebow insists on making sure that everyone knows that he&#8217;s praying. Despite that, I would like to stress that I think Tebow is a wonderful person. There are few people in the world that blow their money on helping others&#8230; I just wish he would let others talk about his strong faith like everyone else does, rather than making sure that everyone and their mother knows he has a strong faith. To me, it just smacks of worrying about what men think of you rather than doing it for the cause&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. By US standards, I&#8217;m a disgusting liberal (that leans Socialist even!). Your blog is far better than any conservative blog I have ever seen based in the US. While I definitely don&#8217;t agree with all of your conclusions, I really wish that conservatives in our country were asking the kind of tough questions that you demanded of liberal society. I personally believe that everyone would come out better off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devotional: The elderly are to be vibrant members of the Church by teatime</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/analysis/devotional-the-elderly-are-to-be-vibrant-members-of-the-church/comment-page-1#comment-56531</link>
		<dc:creator>teatime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17955#comment-56531</guid>
		<description>The elderly do indeed have much to contribute:  to our churches, our families and in countless other ways.  I recommend &quot;Nearing Home&quot; by Billy Graham which delves into this topic.  
It is distressing that the leftists in this country are endorsing euthanasia and &quot;assisted suicide&quot; in an attempt to bump off granny and grandpa.  Why?  So that they can cash in their inheritance sooner?  Disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elderly do indeed have much to contribute:  to our churches, our families and in countless other ways.  I recommend &#8220;Nearing Home&#8221; by Billy Graham which delves into this topic.<br />
It is distressing that the leftists in this country are endorsing euthanasia and &#8220;assisted suicide&#8221; in an attempt to bump off granny and grandpa.  Why?  So that they can cash in their inheritance sooner?  Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gender or Not, Abortion is About Selection: David Krayden by Karol K</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/gender-or-not-abortion-is-about-selection-david-krayden/comment-page-1#comment-56520</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17948#comment-56520</guid>
		<description>Funny that gender abortions cause such a stir in Canada but forced abortions performed on gold diggers (sex workers catering to rich and and powerful) are never even mentioned despite of the fact that whole abortion politics in Canada pivots on this particular issue.

In February of 1950, Henry Morgentaler arrived in Canada, and in 1953 he obtained his medical diploma at University of Montreal by making false claims about his prior medical studies at University of Marburg, Germany and University of Brussels, Belgium, (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler ). Despite of three years of medical studies at U of M and despite of his fraudulently obtained medical diploma Henry Morgentaler could not hack it as a general practitioner in Montreal, so, out of his desperation he become an abortionist. 

In order to protect himself (abortions were illegal in Canada) Henry specialised in elimination (forced abortions) of unwanted children spawned by rich and powerful (politicians. bureaucrats etc) and their relatives. By 1973 Henry got so powerful himself that in one notable letter, discovered recently, he blackmailed then Prime Minister known as P.E.T. (see: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/may/08050801 ). Eventually Henry&#039;s business model of hidden cameras videotaping his clients and blackmail was picked up by people who were supplying girls to Toronto Elite for &quot;well earned&quot; sexual pleasures, see: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4525737&amp;Language=E&amp;Mode=1&amp;Parl=40&amp;Ses=3
Over time Henry&#039;s forced abortion services bloomed and Henry become Toronto Elite&#039;s first line of defence against gold digging call girls who were trying win meal tickets by getting pregnant with rich and powerful (for last line of defence see: http://www.caledonenterprise.com/news/agency-remembers-escort-as-a-%E2%80%98sweet-intelligent-girl%E2%80%99/ ). Grateful Toronto Elite gave Henry rent free place to perform his grisly trade, free security services worth millions of dollars of taxpayers money, (see: http://www.canadafreepress.com/1999/9901a7.htm) and a bubble zone in front of his clinic &quot;vigorously&quot;  enforced by Toronto Police (See: Linda Gibbons prosecution at: http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/imprisonment+Linda+Gibbons/5862988/story.html ) so, nobody would ever see gag and bound gold digger, or any other unfortunate woman for that matter, dragged out of a car into Henry&#039;s clinic. 
In his old age Henry wanted an Order of Canada so it seems that he blackmailed sexual service providers to rich and powerful and they in turn blackmailed people who could arrange the Order of Canada for old Henry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that gender abortions cause such a stir in Canada but forced abortions performed on gold diggers (sex workers catering to rich and and powerful) are never even mentioned despite of the fact that whole abortion politics in Canada pivots on this particular issue.</p>
<p>In February of 1950, Henry Morgentaler arrived in Canada, and in 1953 he obtained his medical diploma at University of Montreal by making false claims about his prior medical studies at University of Marburg, Germany and University of Brussels, Belgium, (see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler</a> ). Despite of three years of medical studies at U of M and despite of his fraudulently obtained medical diploma Henry Morgentaler could not hack it as a general practitioner in Montreal, so, out of his desperation he become an abortionist. </p>
<p>In order to protect himself (abortions were illegal in Canada) Henry specialised in elimination (forced abortions) of unwanted children spawned by rich and powerful (politicians. bureaucrats etc) and their relatives. By 1973 Henry got so powerful himself that in one notable letter, discovered recently, he blackmailed then Prime Minister known as P.E.T. (see: <a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/may/08050801" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/may/08050801</a> ). Eventually Henry&#8217;s business model of hidden cameras videotaping his clients and blackmail was picked up by people who were supplying girls to Toronto Elite for &#8220;well earned&#8221; sexual pleasures, see: <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4525737&#038;Language=E&#038;Mode=1&#038;Parl=40&#038;Ses=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4525737&#038;Language=E&#038;Mode=1&#038;Parl=40&#038;Ses=3</a><br />
Over time Henry&#8217;s forced abortion services bloomed and Henry become Toronto Elite&#8217;s first line of defence against gold digging call girls who were trying win meal tickets by getting pregnant with rich and powerful (for last line of defence see: <a href="http://www.caledonenterprise.com/news/agency-remembers-escort-as-a-%E2%80%98sweet-intelligent-girl%E2%80%99/" rel="nofollow">http://www.caledonenterprise.com/news/agency-remembers-escort-as-a-%E2%80%98sweet-intelligent-girl%E2%80%99/</a> ). Grateful Toronto Elite gave Henry rent free place to perform his grisly trade, free security services worth millions of dollars of taxpayers money, (see: <a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/1999/9901a7.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadafreepress.com/1999/9901a7.htm</a>) and a bubble zone in front of his clinic &#8220;vigorously&#8221;  enforced by Toronto Police (See: Linda Gibbons prosecution at: <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/imprisonment+Linda+Gibbons/5862988/story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/imprisonment+Linda+Gibbons/5862988/story.html</a> ) so, nobody would ever see gag and bound gold digger, or any other unfortunate woman for that matter, dragged out of a car into Henry&#8217;s clinic.<br />
In his old age Henry wanted an Order of Canada so it seems that he blackmailed sexual service providers to rich and powerful and they in turn blackmailed people who could arrange the Order of Canada for old Henry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gender or Not, Abortion is About Selection: David Krayden by Ian Tuck</title>
		<link>http://noapologies.ca/guest-columnists/opinion/gender-or-not-abortion-is-about-selection-david-krayden/comment-page-1#comment-56518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noapologies.ca/?p=17948#comment-56518</guid>
		<description>So these nut cases wish to kill a little girl in the womb and that is OK?  What happen to, &quot;it&#039;s just tissue,&quot; which has no male or female?  Why are the feminists not in a rage over this?  It clearly puts little or no value to the female to be aborted, but a male will be born.  
And the left fanatics will try to accuse Christians of being misogynistic, wow!  You will never find a credible Christian claiming one should abort a baby because she is a girl.  If you did you would also find the entire Christian community condemning that person as unchristian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these nut cases wish to kill a little girl in the womb and that is OK?  What happen to, &#8220;it&#8217;s just tissue,&#8221; which has no male or female?  Why are the feminists not in a rage over this?  It clearly puts little or no value to the female to be aborted, but a male will be born.<br />
And the left fanatics will try to accuse Christians of being misogynistic, wow!  You will never find a credible Christian claiming one should abort a baby because she is a girl.  If you did you would also find the entire Christian community condemning that person as unchristian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

